FlamingFoodies logoFlamingFoodies

Editorial policy

What we expect from pages before they stay public.

FlamingFoodies aims to make recipes, explainers, reviews, and shopping guides feel useful, specific, and clear about what kind of page the reader is on.

Last updated April 27, 2026

Page intent

Educational pages should teach first.

Recipes, explainers, and culture pieces are expected to stand on their own before any shopping or product references are layered in. If the page is mainly about a bottle or buying decision, it should read like a review or buying guide instead of pretending to be pure education.

Originality

Specificity beats filler.

We want pages to sound grounded in real kitchen use, shelf context, and practical decision-making. Repetitive phrasing, vague hype, or templated “craveable” copy is a sign a page needs more work before it deserves wider visibility.

Commercial clarity

Monetization should never hide the page type.

Reviews, comparison pages, and gift guides can be commercial-intent surfaces. Blog explainers and educational stories should not read like shopping pages wearing an educational headline.

Sourcing and updates

What we try to make explicit.

Explanatory pages should be anchored in clear kitchen context, observable product details, and sourceable facts where claims depend on outside information.

We may use internal publishing tools to support drafting, organization, or QA, but a page still has to meet the same usefulness and trust standards before it stays public.

If a page becomes stale, over-optimized, repetitive, or too thin to justify indexation, we would rather revise it, noindex it, or pull it back than leave it floating as filler.